A Few More Trees in the Display of Information

JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

I'd like to add the few images below to a developing thread on the use of trees in diagrammatic displays of information as seen earlier on this blog in the following posts:

• Trees as Symbols int he Display of Information

• The Tree of Life and Coal's Phylogeny--a decent Diagram but a Bad Idea

• The Family Tree of Computer Development

This is a distinctive utilization, featuring a king and queen versions of the tree/plant display, this by Edward Hitchcock (1763-1864) in his Elementary Geology, published in 1840, and showing paleontological chart of trees andplants:

At about the same time came this outline for a tree diagram, (of embryonic development), from Robert Chambers, Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, printed in 1844, and which shows a model of development where fish (F), reptiles (R), and birds (B) represent branches from a path leading to mammals (M):

And somehow in the different representations of the tree of life by Ernst Haeckel I failed to include these three very famous renderings, the first made for an English-language edition of his Evolution of Man, which appeared in 1879:

And this version, which appeared in the fifth edition of his Evolution of Man, printed in London in 1910:

And yet another, this one much earlier, in 1866:

Comments

[Jeff Donlan]

I feel more and more Crustacean as I get older. Looking at Haeckel's 1879 tree, this is a long way down. Can Ontogeny De-recapitulate Phylogeny?

[John F. Ptak]

Jeff--Yes! Or no! Or maybe it is ontogeny decapitates Phylogeny?

Did you know that the Creation Messeum in Kentucky now claims that Barbie is sorta Eve? Well, almost: there is an exhibit there that establishes dragons=dinosaurs. Very creative!

[Jeff Donlan]

Dragons = dinosaurs makes great sense. The ICR likes Mt. St. Helens, too. Still, I prefer Arthur C. Clarke's explanation for gargoyles (see Childhood's End).