JF Ptak Science Books LLC Post 966
Now that the new Tim Burton Alice film is out, let's not forget that there was a real Alice on which Lewis Carroll's Alice was based. She looks, well, pretty formidable. (Alice Liddell.)
A photo by Carroll of Alice at a younger age. In spite of his logic and math and Snark and Alice, Carroll's "artistic" photos of children are pretty creepy to me.
A great advertisement using Alice appears in LIFE in 1954, an early ad from Western Electric for microminiaturized electronics. So far as I can tell this is one of the very earliest popular ads for what will absolutely revolutionize the country over the next thirty years.
And of course there was a series of ads with literary backdrops for Guinness Stout, appearing in the 1940's and 1950's:
:
It's so hard not to read things into Dodgson's photos and the demeanor of the girls in them. The photos you link to include one comment: "Charles Dodgson's last portrait of Alice. Morton Cohen calls her "sullen," I call her pensive, perhaps sad. (1870)" I find myself hoping she had no good reason for being sullen before Dodgson's camera in particular. There is a creepiness to the photos, but I can't tell how much I am informed by modern speculation. It is certain that there is unfairness at play one way or the other. Ah, well.
Posted by: Jeff Donlan | 07 March 2010 at 07:01 PM
I think Cohen may have been polite. To me, CLD's Alice photo's always seemde to show a rather petulant & spoiled young lady.
I love the Guiness adverts, somehow, I think a dark bitter beer is just the thing for a Mad Hatter's Party! And what the heck, kids love it too!
Posted by: Mahendra Singh | 08 March 2010 at 05:17 PM
Jeff: sometimes creepy is just creepy, modernist filter or not. I've seen LC's work and there's a lot of it that just reminds me of a post turtle. (Don't know how it got there, etc.) when I think of the exactness of his work in just about everything else, I would say that little in his photography was left to "chance". MAHENDRA: I have little doubt that she was spoiled (given the background and the times, etc) but I don't know about petulent. And so far as the Guinness goes: MIAB (meal-in-a-bottle) means BAIM backwards, and since neither means anything at all, then it all must be correct. Or soemthing.
Posted by: John F. Ptak | 08 March 2010 at 07:57 PM