WWI Photography US in London detail
WWI Photography Catalog

The Fine Print

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

« The Best Dollar the Government Ever Spent? The Migrant Mother, 1936 | Main | Early Ennui in Art--a Peek at the Illustrated History of Boredom »

Comments

Ray Girvan

Interesting to consider, though, how many of Poe's assumptions could equally apply to a modern chess program, and are clearly wrong: for instance, "a pure machine ... would always win".

The determinacy point is wrong too. A mechanical randomizer (or pseudorandom lookup table) wouldn't be hard to contrive.

Rob MacD

Terrific post, John.

I haven't got the details with me, but you're right about Babbage's place or lack thereof in early computer history. He was largely forgotten in the early to mid 20th C (but not entirely - in the 1920s, Leslie Comrie described Babbage as a predecessor of mechanical computation) but rediscovered and written back into the history of computing in a big way in the 1960s and 1970s. Jon Agar's book The Government Machine is good on what the history of computing does and doesn't owe to Babbage.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Categories