Google search


Blog powered by TypePad
AddThis Feed Button

The Fine Print

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Blog Widget by LinkWithin
Blog Widget by LinkWithin

« The British Navy Displayed, 1904: Forty Miles of Ships in an Early-ish Example of Good Display of Quantitative Data | Main | Ghost Trails of the Mississippi River: Harold Fisk's Geological Map of 1944 »

June 25, 2008

Pre-histories of Great Ideas: Mandelbrot and the Fractal, 1967-1975

JF Ptak Science Books LLC  Post 143
Blogmandelbrot217_2 This is the first of a few short essays of the idea of pre-historic appearances of important ideas. I use the word “pre-historic” in its literal sense—that is, these papers were published before the concepts that they discussed were recognized and published, later, in more complete form and of course to greater fame. One will certainly be Gregor Mendl’s paper (Versuche über Plflanzenhybriden ) published in the obscure Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn, (Brno), and to be resurrected at the hands of Gregory Bateson thirty-odd years later. Another example is Vannevar Bush’s “As We May Think”, published in The Atlantic Monthly in June 1945, and which was a definite intellectual precursor to the construction of the Internet. A third

Right now, though, I’d like to look at the pre-birth of fractals in Benoit Mandelbrot’s precursor (1967) paper (and in a weird, probably not-correct way, scooping himself) to his more famous effort of 1975, in which he coins the term and fully describes fractals, showing the measurement of the coastlines behave like a fractal over a range of measurement scales.

The seminal paper, How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension, published in Science magazine in 1967, is an introduction to the concept of fractals (which Mandelbrot would name in later in1975), The kernel of it all is found in the Lewis Fry Richardson graphs and more so in the small illustration on page three of the paper—the peek into the future world of fractals, seeing a fractal before it was named so.

Blogmandelbrot2218

Blogmandelbrot217_3

Richardson (a kind of Jevons, Marey-like American figure on the history of 20th century science) did some very good thinking about the elusive nature of naming such a thing as the lengths of coastlines and other natural constructions: namely he determined that their measured length was dependent upon the scale of measurement. That is to say the measured length, L(G), is ruled the scale of G, approximating the function as L(G)=M(G)1-0 

Mandelbrot moves on to discuss the coastline in terms of it being a self-similar object, which is something that is nearly exactly similar to a part of itself, or the whole having the same shape of one or more than one of its parts, and regresses.

Mandelbrotfern


 

 

 

The Mandelbrot Fern (courtesy of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Fractal_fern_explained.png) displaying self-similar properties. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83542d51e69e200e55371b46c8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pre-histories of Great Ideas: Mandelbrot and the Fractal, 1967-1975:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment